April 19, 1999

Mr. David Boergers, Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
888 First Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.  20426

Re:	Southern California Edison Co., California Independent System
	Operator Corp., El Segundo Power, LLC, Docket Nos. ER98-441-000
	And ER98-2550-000

	Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC, and
	Duke Energy Oakland LLC, Docket Nos. ER98-495-000,
	ER98-1614-000, ER98-2145-000, ER98-2668-000,
	ER98-2669-000, ER98-4296-000 and ER98-4300-000

	San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Docket Nos. ER98-496-000 and
	ER98-2160-000

	Southern California Edison Co., Pacific Gas & Electric Co., San Diego
	Gas & Electric Co., Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC, Duke Energy
	Oakland LLC, Docket Nos. ER98-441-001, ER98-495-001,
	ER98-496-001, ER98-4300-001, ER98-2668-001, ER98-2669-001,
	ER98-4296-001, ER98-2668-000, ER98-2669-000, ER99-1127-000,
	ER99-1128-000, ER98-4296-000 and ER98-4300-000

Dear Mr. Boergers:

	In accordance with the provisions of Rule 602 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”), 18 C.F.R. § 385.602 (1998), and the Chief Administrative Law Judge’s March 16, 1999 Order, enclosed please find an original and fourteen copies of the Initial Comments of the California Independent System Operator Corporation (“ISO”) in Support of the Offer of Settlement submitted on April 2, 1999, by El Segundo Power LLC, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Duke Energy Moss Landing LLC, Duke Energy Oakland LLC, Duke Energy South Bay, LLC, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Company, Reliant Energy Etiwanda, L.L.C., Reliant Energy 

Mr. David Boergers
April 19, 1999
Page 2

Mandalay, L.L.C., Southern Energy Delta, L.L.C., Southern Energy Potrero, L.L.C., Cabrillo Power I LLC, Cabrillo Power II LLC, Geysers Power Company, LLC, the 
California Electricity Oversight Board, Southern California Edison Company, Enron Power Marketing, Inc., and the ISO in the above-captioned dockets.

	The matters encompassed by the Offer of Settlement either have been specifically set for hearing or are intertwined with matters set for hearing.  The various cases in which the hearing matters arose have been retained for consideration by the Chief Administrative Law Judge who has acted as a Settlement Judge under Rule 603 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. § 385.603 (1998).  Accordingly, the ISO will provide a copy of this filing to him.

	An additional copy of this filing is enclosed.  Please stamp this copy with the date and time of filing and return it to our messenger.

						Respectfully submitted,

												
						Edward Berlin
						J. Phillip Jordan
						Mark R. Klupt
						Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman, LLP
						Attorneys for the California Independent
							System Operator Corporation

cc:	Hon. Curtis L. Wagner Jr.
	Service List

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

	I hereby certify that I have served the foregoing document upon all parties on the official service list compiled by the Secretary in the above-captioned dockets, in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2010 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR § 385.2010).
	Dated at Washington, D.C. this 19th day of April, 1999.

												
						Mark R. Klupt