5 Congestion Revenue Rights

Congestion revenue rights auction efficiency 1B became in effect on January 1, 2019. It includes key changes related to the congestion revenue rights settlements process:

  • Targeted reduction of congestion revenue rights payouts on a constraint by constraint basis.
  • Distribute congestion revenues to the extent that CAISO collected the requisite revenue on the constraint over the month. That is, implement a pro-rata funding for CRRs.
  • Allow surpluses on one constraint in one hour to offset deficits on the same constraint in another hour over the course of the month.
  • Only distribute surpluses to congestion revenue rights if the surplus is collected on a constraint that the congestion revenue right accrued a deficit, and only up to the full target payment value of the congestion revenue right.
  • Distribute remaining surplus revenue at the end of the month, which are associated with constraints that collect more surplus over the month than deficits, to measured demand.

Monthly CRR Revenue

Figure 11 illustrates the daily CRR notional value in the corresponding month for the various transmission elements that experienced congestion during the month. CRR notional value is calculated as the product of CRR implied flow and constraint shadow price in each hour per constraint and CRR.

Figure 11: Daily CRR Notional Value by Transmission Element

Daily CRR Notional Value by Transmission Element

Figure 12 illustrates the daily CRR offset value in the corresponding month for the transmission elements that experienced congestion during the month. CRR offset value is the difference between the revenue collected from the congestion CRR. A positive CRR offset value represents surplus and a negative CRR offset value represents shortfall.

The main reasons for CRR offset shortfall are

  • The transformer 32214_RIO OSO _115_30330_RIO OSO _230_XF_2A was binding in 28 days of this month, resulting in offset shortfall of $3.24 million.
  • The line 34724_KRN OL J_115_34736_MAGUNDEN_115_BR_1 _1 was binding in 30 days of this month, resulting in offset shortfall of $2.99 million.

The main reason for CRR offset surplus is

  • MALIN500_ISL was binding in 19 days of this month, resulting in offset surplus of $3.87 million.

Figure 12: Daily CRR Offset Value by Transmission Element

Daily CRR Offset Value by Transmission Element

Furthermore, Table 5 shows the monthly CRR deficit in the month broken out by transmission elements and Table 6 shows the monthly CRR surplus in the month broken out by transmission elements.

Table 5: CRR Deficit by Transmission Element
Constraint Percent
Other 23.25
32214_RIO OSO _115_30330_RIO OSO _230_XF_2A 19.61
34724_KRN OL J_115_34736_MAGUNDEN_115_BR_1 _1 18.15
32214_RIO OSO _115_30330_RIO OSO _230_XF_1A 7.62
30750_MOSSLD _230_30797_LASAGUIL_230_BR_1 _1 7.24
34412_HERNDON _115_30835_HERNDON _230_XF_3 6.21
7440_MetcalfImport_Tes-Metcalf 5.92
34116_LE GRAND_115_34115_ADRA TAP_115_BR_1 _1 4.76
34728_LIVE OAK_115_34752_KERN PWR_115_BR_1 _1 3.20
NdGrp: 31480_WYANDTTE_115_B1 2.20
33724_LOCKEFRD_60.0_33736_LODI JCT_60.0_BR_1 _1 1.85
Table 6: CRR Surplus by Transmission Element
Constraint Percent
MALIN500_ISL 38.79
30060_MIDWAY _500_24156_VINCENT _500_BR_2 _3 14.73
30055_GATES1 _500_30900_GATES _230_XF_12_P 14.67
Other 12.16
22356_IMPRLVLY_230_21025_ELCENTRO_230_BR_1 _1 10.72
NOB_ITC 2.87
NdGrp: 36411_DIABLO 1_25.0_B1 1.91
MEAD_ITC 1.40
NdGrp: 36412_DIABLO 2_25.0_B1 1.19
MONAIPPDC_ITC 0.94
NdGrp: 31786_ROCK CK1_13.8_B1 0.62

Table 7 shows the monthly CRR payment in the month broken out by transmission elements

Table 7: CRR Payment by Transmission Element
Constraint Percent
NOB_ITC 22.65
MALIN500_ISL 21.20
30750_MOSSLD _230_30797_LASAGUIL_230_BR_1 _1 11.86
Other 9.61
30055_GATES1 _500_30900_GATES _230_XF_12_P 9.61
30060_MIDWAY _500_24156_VINCENT _500_BR_2 _3 7.02
34116_LE GRAND_115_34115_ADRA TAP_115_BR_1 _1 7.01
7440_MetcalfImport_Tes-Metcalf 4.89
7430_Summer_KTTLM_GATES_70_1 2.31
NdGrp: 36411_DIABLO 1_25.0_B1 2.18
30515_WARNERVL_230_30800_WILSON _230_BR_1 _1 1.67

Table 8 shows the monthly CRR payments. Net monthly balancing surplus in July was $4.83 million. The auction revenues credited to the balancing account for July was $12.04 million. As a result, the balancing account for July had a surplus of approximately $16.87 million, which was allocated to measured demand. The Net Monthly Balancing Surplus is calculated as sum of CRR surplus plus CRR daily Balancing account minus total auction revenue. The Total Auction revenue is sum of monthly and annual auction revenue. The Allocation to Measured demand is calculated as sum of Total Auction revenue plus Net Monthly Balancing Surplus.

Table 8: CRR Revenue Statistics
Description JULY -2022 JUNE -2022
CRR Notional Value $75,253,264 $149,205,401
CRR Deficit -$16,491,571 -$42,592,770
CRR Settlement Rule -$12,852 -$29,294
CRR Adjusted Payment $58,748,842 $106,583,337
CRR Surplus $9,988,582 $14,827,158
Monthly Auction Revenue $8,384,206 $6,171,439
Annual Auction Revenue $3,651,633 $4,892,018
CRR Daily Balancing Account $6,879,370 -$5,050,852
Net Monthly Balancing Surplus $4,832,113 -$1,287,150
Allocation to Measured Demand $16,867,952 $9,776,306