Library

e-Tagging timing requirements (completed)

Outcome: FERC Order: Oct. 18, 2010 (ER11-3700); Board of Governors decision: Feb. 10, 2010

e-Tag timing requirements have been highlighted as an issue in several stakeholder initiatives such as Convergence Bidding. The California ISO currently requires an e-tag no later than T-20 after adjustments in Hour-Ahead Scheduling Process (HASP). The large majority of market participants have voluntarily tagged Integrated Forward Market (IFM) awards prior to HASP. Several market participants have expressed concern that not requiring an e-tag for IFM awards prior to HASP can lead to implicit virtual bidding at interties and the feasibility of Day-Ahead schedules may be at risk.

39 documents

39 of 39 results
Title Type Posted
Barclays Capital Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 36.27 KB Comment 01/25/2010, 1:52 PM
Morgan Stanley Capital Group Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 39.06 KB Comment 01/25/2010, 1:50 PM
SCE Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 96.74 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 4:56 PM
NCPA Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 91.94 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 9:26 AM
CPUC Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 118.19 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 9:24 AM
Powerex Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 26.17 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 9:20 AM
PG&E Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 76.32 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 9:20 AM
J.P. Morgan / Shell Energy Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 22.32 KB Comment 01/22/2010, 9:15 AM
Draft Final Proposal - e-Tag Timing Requirements 07-Jan-2010 169.93 KB Proposal 01/07/2010, 11:33 AM
CPUC Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 100.54 KB Comment 01/05/2010, 3:15 PM
SCE Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 94.91 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:08 PM
PG&E Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 86.80 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:07 PM
NCPA Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 91.05 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:06 PM
J.P. Morgan / Shell Energy Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 17.96 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:05 PM
WPTF Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 152.83 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:04 PM
SMUD Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 37.14 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:03 PM
Powerex Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 26.70 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:02 PM
Barclays Capital Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 39.14 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 2:01 PM
Morgan Stanley Capital Group Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 11.45 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 1:59 PM
Citigroup Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 107.01 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 1:58 PM
Dynegy Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 26.14 KB Comment 12/22/2009, 1:56 PM
DMM Comments on E-Tag Straw Proposal 82.77 KB Comment 12/10/2009, 4:06 PM
Straw Proposal - e-Tag Timing Requirements 07-Dec-2010 166.55 KB Proposal 12/07/2009, 10:49 AM
City of Riverside Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 90.62 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:44 PM
Powerex Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 42.83 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:42 PM
MID1 Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 86.23 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:39 PM
Mirant Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 104.10 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:37 PM
Morgan Stanley Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 42.07 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:30 PM
Barcap-RBSSempra Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 24.72 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:27 PM
Joint Parties Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 107.98 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:25 PM
CPUC Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 101.08 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:23 PM
CEI Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 38.33 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:22 PM
SCE Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 128.46 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:20 PM
PG&E Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 92.48 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:19 PM
GRP Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 69.42 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:18 PM
SMUD Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 21.46 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:16 PM
Dynegy Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 92.41 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:13 PM
WPTF Comments on E-Tag Timing Requirements 20.14 KB Comment 11/06/2009, 3:11 PM
Revised Issue Paper - E-Tag Timing Requirements 22-Oct-2009 159.30 KB Paper 10/22/2009, 3:57 PM
No results
Back to top